Menu
Home
The Big Lie

The Big Lie

On her election to government Jacinda Ardern promised to govern for “all New Zealanders”.

This has since proven to be the Big Lie!!!

Jacinda Ardern has claimed that her government is the most open and transparent that we have had and that they should be considered as the one source of truth. This is also another lie.

Her government has taken away democratic rights from communities and freedoms from individuals. They are guilty of following a radical socialist ideology and altering our legal and regulatory framework and championing the replacement of democracy a race based tribal rule nothing short of Apartheid.

In an address to the World Economic Forum at its annual meeting in Switzerland during 2019 Jacinda Ardern stated that she is using her time in office as Prime Minister, to embed reforms that will lead to permanent change. She also said that her Government is doing something not many other countries have tried, fundamentally changing how we make decisions and allocate resources.

In her address to the ASPEC conference she spoke of every crisis presenting an opportunity and that although Covid had dealt the 21 APEC economies a heavy burden, it was also an opportunity to make an economic reset and she said: “We must not allow the post-COVID recovery to return to business-as-usual.”

It is almost unbelievable that New Zealand has to discover the PM’s agenda for New Zealand by studying her speeches to overseas audiences. She has failed to be open and transparent about her government’s elite agendas and radical reforms she is introducing, and certainly does not in my opinion show any sign of being the one source of truth that she asked us to treat her government as.  

In fact, in my opinion she has totally betrayed the New Zealand public, by authorising a list of separatist policy changes that undermine our democracy such as; forcing race-based representation into local government, introducing tikanga into the law, and requiring the public service to not only adopt the fictitious Treaty principles and the fabricated Treaty partnership, but to implement racial privilege across the board, promoting a change to the name of New Zealand without any electoral mandate to do so, etc.

It is clear to see that these changes to the democratic principles on which our society has been founded will only create a racial divide which will grow wider and deeper as this current Labour government introduces more of its race based tribal supremacy agenda which is nothing more than a system of Apartheid.

A classic example of this race based tribal supremacy agenda being the Three Waters Reforms. These reforms, which have been postponed till March, will confiscate billions of dollars of ratepayer-funded assets from councils, in order to pass control of water services to the tribal elite.

Under the guise of implementing the UN’s Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, a race based minority is being given control and veto rights over all other New Zealanders. The ultimate goal is to bestow privilege on those of Maori descent, relegating everyone else to second-class status.

Claiming “co-governance” is about fairness and equity, we now know that the real agenda is to enable privileged Maori to seize control of public resources and service for the private benefit of the tribal elite. 

The Maori Development Minister Willie Jackson stated last week, “Who would have dreamed that we would have had our own Māori Health Authority?” yet this is what is happening with the Pae Ora health legislation. Maori are given a separate management structure for health with the power of veto over spending through the total health budget.

Through Labour’s power to govern alone – and with the support of a complicit media – the agenda for Maori supremacy is now being fast-tracked by Prime Minister Ardern as she delivers control of our country to the unelected and unaccountable representatives of multi-million-dollar private sector iwi corporations, one co-governance deal at a time. 

Under Jacinda Ardern’s guidance, a massive transfer of power is now underway that is replacing New Zealand democracy with tribal rule. The agenda for iwi control of the country was set out in the Government’s 2019 He Puapua report that was kept deliberately hidden throughout 2020 – not only from her coalition partner, but also from the public during the election campaign – even as parts of the strategy were being enacted.

How could any New Zealand Government be so foolish as to go down this track and allow tribalism to over-rule democracy?

We have just last year celebrated the forty year anniversary of the anti-apartheid protests against the Springbok rugby tour of NZ in 1981 which were instrumental in the removal of the apartheid system of government in South Africa at that time.  Yet here we now have a government that is intent on implementing a similar system of government into New Zealand based on the fallacy that there was a co-governance partnership formed with Maori by the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi.

There is actually no reference whatsoever in any of the treaty documents to any co-governance partnership and this contention is backed by many commentators including the prominent leader respected by Pakeha & Maori alike.

‘The Hon Sir Apirana Ngata -M.A. LLB. LIT.D’

(THE TREATY OF WAITANGI   – an explanation published in 1922)

The acclaimed Maori Leader Sir Apirana Ngata explains the intent in the pages of this book, the “Treaty of Waitangi”. He concludes with the words: “The Treaty made the one law for the Maori and Pakeha. If you think these things are wrong and bad then blame our ancestors who gave away their rights in the days when they were powerful”.

Under this Government’s financial management we have rampant house price inflation, and rising costs. There has been a huge increase in the size of the national government bureaucracy, massive waste of taxpayers’ money and the creation of eye-watering debt, all of which will invariably lead to future tax increases – no doubt justified as being in the interest of “fairness and equity”.

With interest rates now rising, the economy will increasingly become an issue for this government which has yet to demonstrate any real sign that it has the skills to effectively manage the national economy.
 
We now see Carbon taxes are starting to show an effect by not only forcing up the cost of goods and services across the economy, but the tax incentives are leading to the conversion of productive farmland into unproductive pine forestry that will never be maintained nor harvested.  This government subsidised conversion of productive farmland into forestry blocks that will never be harvested, amounts to crazy economic decision making that will lay waste to many rural communities and starve our economy of much needed export earnings.

2022 looks to be a year of turmoil as this Labour Government attempts to force through radical and unwelcome changes which will destabilise our existing democracy by implementing a race based tribal elite governance system which will remove many personal freedoms and rights of the majority of the population, in the governance of New Zealand.

These divide and rule strategies being enacted by Jacinda Ardern’s government, are classic Socialist strategies as set out in the book by Saul Alinsky which detailed how to achieve a socialist state and set out eight levels of control that must be obtained before you can create a socialist state:

How to Create a Socialist State – Rules for Radicals:

There are eight levels of control that must be obtained to create a socialist state with the first and most important one being control of Healthcare.

  1. Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.
  2. Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible; poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
  3. Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and that will produce more poverty.
  4. Gun Control – Remove the ability of people to defend themselves from the government. That way you are able to create a police state.
  5. Welfare – Take control of every aspect of the population’s life (Food, Housing and Income).
  6. Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.
  7. Religion – Remove the belief in god from Government and schools.
  8. Class Warfare – Divide the people into wealthy and poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the wealthy to support the poor.

It doesn’t take much imagination to see all of the above occurring in New Zealand of recent times.

The general population relies in a large part, on the media to keep them informed of current happenings and also expect the media to be the watchdog that expounds the voice of reason on their behalf, but where has the New Zealand media been in all of this?

Totally missing from the action!

A democracy cannot function in the absence of an impartial, literate, and experienced media. In one of the more shamefully blatant abuses of taxpayer’s money the government created a “media rescue fund” of fifty million dollars to keep the print media afloat.

The quid pro quo for receiving a share of this taxpayer’s largesse is that the recipient is prohibited from questioning any of the government policies essential to the fulfilment of its socialist agenda in particular:

  • The notion of an equal partnership between some Maori tribes and the rest of New Zealand, the Three Waters seizing of rate payer assets for a pittance,
  • The notion that Maori people have been the subject of a brutal colonisation conferring no benefits only pain,
  • The catastrophist theory of manmade global warming and
  • That farmers are polluting the planet.

English is the common language of New Zealand which gives all of us the advantage of understanding the majority of our fellow citizens. A classic socialist agenda is to destabilise this ability by encouraging the use of a rival language which very few citizens speak or wish to speak and is spoken nowhere else in the world. This then impairs the ability of one citizen to understand another with all the social dislocation that entails. In a mature democracy that is no easy task. A promising beginning is to destroy a hundred and forty years of belonging by changing the name of the country.

There is no precedent for changing the country’s name to something made up to suit a tiny minority of its citizens, without the support of a huge majority of the population. The entire history of a country and its place in the world is wrapped up in its name. Yet we now have here in New Zealand a major push by Jacinda Ardern’s government to use “Aotearoa” instead of New Zealand as the official name of our country.

This has obviously in effect involved instructing Government Departments and major media (at least) to continually push the name Aotearoa in association with or, increasingly, at the expense of our country’s name, New Zealand.

We, as a country have spent billions of dollars over many, many years promoting the name New Zealand and giving it identity and meaning internationally.

It is our Brand name in the same way as names like Coca Cola, Colgate, Persil, Watties, Palmolive, Milo, Vegemite and many others are brand names instantly conveying the identity, positive benefits and positive consumer associations with them. 

This Government’s whole agenda in this area is TOTALLY WITHOUT MANDATE. 

 It is insidious, devious, manipulative and dishonest. 

Until this current government was elected, New Zealand had one of the oldest democracies in the world both national and local in which central governments and local bodies were answerable to the ballot of one person one vote.

All government policies were shaped against the certain knowledge that democracy was sacrosanct. Yet New Zealand no longer enjoys local body democracy.

Instead, we have some members of councils elected by ballot and some claiming Maori genealogy appointed without the necessity of standing in an election. This has been passed off as small step in ensuring that such persons are represented in local body decision making.

Of course, that is not how democracy works. Democracy is not a prize for minorities or ethnicities. If it were then we would have councils comprised of the numerous immigrant groups which make up our society.

With councils simply appointing Maori representatives without any input from the electors the result is an assault on local body democracy. This assault on the basic democracy of our society has been largely ignored by the electorate in the wake of the Covid pandemic, with the majority of the public concentrating on, and fearing rampant expansion of illness and death resulting from the Covid virus.

This assault on local body democracy is only the beginning. A full scale assault on Parliamentary democracy is next and the Maori caucus surrounding the Prime Minister now makes no secret of this. Based on the fallacy that the Treaty created a shared sovereignty with the Queen in Parliament they are pressing for separate Parliaments and the creation of an ethnic state in which fifteen percent of the population claiming some Maori blood will dominate.

This is one of the basic recommendations from the “He PuaPua Report”. It envisages that by 2040 – the 200th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi – the nation will be ruled under an equal power-sharing arrangement between Māori and non-Māori leaders.

It is highly unlikely that ordinary Maori citizens will participate in this power grab. What will really result is that those who control the larger tribes will become all powerful. This is vintage Socialism and if it succeeds, then New Zealand will be unique in allowing its democracy to be replaced by tribalism.

This illusion of a “Treaty Partnership” which current tribal chiefs supported by attention seeking academics claim that those chiefs who signed the Treaty on 6th February 1840 somehow entered into with the British Crown is just that, an illusion. As a matter of law and constitutional practice there is not and cannot be such partnership and that is plain to anybody capable of reading the terms of the document.

The simple historical fact is that for the British the alternatives were either securing an agreement or sailing away and leaving the natives to the tender mercies of any of other the nineteenth century colonising nations; the French, Dutch, Portuguese, or the Belgians with their collective appalling records of abuse of the indigenous peoples.

Faced with this reality a small group of wiser heads among the chiefs, by a narrow majority decided to become subjects of the British Queen in Parliament and to enjoy her protection from the other would-be colonists.

It proved to be a very wise decision and was followed on the 16th of November 1840 by the Royal Charter which superseded the Treaty and confirmed the rights and responsibilities of the native inhabitants and the Crown and established a legislative framework supported by the common law.

The dishonest attempts to ignore the Royal Charter and reinterpret the Treaty based on some inessential observations by some of the judges in the 1987 State Owned Enterprises Act case ignore the evidence of Sir Henare Ngata in that case expressly referred to in the Judgment of Sir Robin Cook:

“A contentious matter such as the Treaty will yield to those who study it whatever they seek if they look for difficulties and obstacles, they will find them. If they are prepared to regard it as an obligation of honour, they will find that the Treaty is well capable of implementation”

To which the Judge added:

              “The basis of the compact requires each party to act reasonably and in good faith”

This has been and is the basis of the historical relationship between Māori and non-Māori but is now being supplanted by greedy rent seekers devoid of any notion of good faith and such is the basis of their claims to “partnership.” If some elements in the present government get their way the local body experiment will become a template for elections to Parliament.

To destroy a democracy you need to set one group against another and in the New Zealand situation this has been attempted by using the notion, in a deceitful and dishonest way, that the Treaty created a “partnership” between Māori and non-Māori. The result is that a tiny number of tribal elites and academics are being handed the means to disrupt and destroy our way of life by driving a wedge between those with some Maori blood and the rest of society.

There have been stirrings of mass dissent in the two “ground swell” demonstrations, with another pending in February. Initially conceived as a protest by farmers against mindless government interference in farming practices, the second gathering included many city folk.  All of course were ignored by the government other than to make sarcastic and disparaging comments about “anti vaxers,” and all minimally reported by the government media outlets. Where it will end is impossible to say but on current portents it will not end well for our democracy and freedoms.

Andy Loader