The questions below were submitted to all candidates for the Waikato Regional Council (WRC) elections. These questions were developed by P.L.U.G. Primary Land Users Group.
Questions to Candidates for Waikato Regional Council Elections
The questions above were submitted to all candidates for the WRC elections by:
P.L.U.G. Primary Land Users Group and all answers received are published as returned.
Find out more about the WRC Elections here.
Candidate Answers
Bala Tikkisetty
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
o
I am a postgraduate with several years of advanced training in environmental management. Over 25 years, I have worked for regional councils in the country promoting sustainable environmental practices. With my extensive experience and pragmatic thinking, I intend to bring a new and unique set of skills and perspective to the Council.
If elected to council, who are you working for?
o
Of course, our communities. Standing for public office – and being elected to represent the interests of our community – comes with greater responsibility that demands hard work, sacrifice and dedication.
o
As a member of a regional council, I will have the opportunity to make a positive difference to the lives of those who live in our community.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
o
I support a genuine consultation with Māori and other communities on any future changes affecting their representation in local government.
Will you vote to cap rates?
o
I know most of us acknowledge the need for financial efficiency. The HOW is the real challenge. I feel, all the elected councillors must balance the affordability of rates and user charges.
o
Reducing the essential services is not an option. “Nice to have” services will be looked critically and carefully. All said and done, I will focus on getting highest value for rating dollar.
o
Inflation is one hard reality. However, a proper analysis of cost-benefit ratio is highly required.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
o
To determine if the Waikato regional economy is “robust” in three years, as required by the Waikato Settlement Act, several key indicators will have to be monitored. These include GDP growth, employment rates, export performance, infrastructure development, and Māori economic development. Specifically, the Waikato Regional Council to track GDP growth against a regional baseline, monitor the unemployment rate, analyse export data (including both primary and secondary sectors), assess the progress of key infrastructure projects, and evaluate the success of initiatives designed to support and grow Māori-led businesses and economic participation.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
o
In addition to my public sector and regional council experience in preparation of budgets etc., for many years I’ve had the privilege of serving our community as Chairperson of a charitable organisation, and as Chairperson of the local branch of the Justices of the Peace. I’m also actively involved in several community and voluntary organisations.
o
These roles have given me the experience in the areas of financial management and governance. Those experiences have developed my skills to listen, to lead, and to deliver results for people from all walks of life. I’m a proven community leader, and now I’m standing for the Waikato Regional Council to take that same commitment to the next level.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
o
Generally, it should be used for status quo and/or business as usual – however each situation needs to be assessed on its merits. I will study/debate more about the pros and cons of the change.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
o
Increasing efficiency with strict accountability. Delivering work plan with quality and within approved budgets. Provide Council with sound and timely advice, implement council decisions, and manage the council operations effectively.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
o
Yes
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
o
Although I have significant knowledge of PC1, to start with I would update myself with the details of the changed legislation and its requirements, then workout the expectations of the NPS and PC1.
Implementation Plan with staff resourcing issues will be discussed. Redeploying staff is also one of the ways to reduce the cost.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
o
It is the responsibility of both. Nationally we should have a strategic plan and approach, regionally the operational plan which should be executed.
o
In my view climate change is real. Two major contributors are Agriculture and Transport.
o
Farming is our Country’s backbone. I will work promoting and implementing Good Management Practices (GMPs) in the farming sector without reduction in production and productivity. Economy and Environment, it is NOT ‘either’ ‘or’ both are important for the country.
o
The Regional Couci provides public transport services in the region. My focus will be on integrating sustainability into every decision, so that our transport system becomes cleaner, more efficient and more accessible for everyone.
o
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transport requires a combination of practical changes and long-term investments. Some examples:
▪
Behavioural changes: encouraging more use of public transport, walking, cycling and carpooling where possible.
▪
Operational measures: supporting the shift to low-emission transport, again such as carpooling
▪
Investment initiatives: Expanding safe cycling infrastructure, improving public transport networks
o
With climate change there is a real risk that the cost of flood protection will increase, and the costs associated with establishing and maintaining these assets will also increase. Prepare for the eventuality.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
o
In Lower Waikato and Waipa catchments, the levels of sediment loss and erosion are significant. I am aware of noxious pest fish, Koi Carp, and its habit and habitat, and its impact on wider environment.
o
I will work for a strategic plan and its implementation for control of Koi Carp and its deleterious effects on other native flora and fauna.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
o
Support with caution. I believe in recognition and acknowledgement through environmental awards and incentives. I will work and explore the possibilities for achieving rates rebates for riparian and other significant environmental works. Too much of administrative work, but cost incentives would be easy to implement.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
o
It may not be possible to get back to the natural environment what was there 150 years ago. But we all must work together to protect our environment from any further degradation to sustain our economy.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
o
I support construction, upgrades and maintenance of the region’s flood protection infrastructure, including projects supported by the Regional Infrastructure Fund. I also support funding of asset renewals, and investigation into sustainable solutions.
o
Focus on preparing for and responding to severe climatic events and safeguarding the communities from impacts of climate change.
o
I will be working with the territorial authorities in our region to understand the long-term challenges facing our communities and developing targeted community adaptation plans in response.
•
Finally, I will be focussing, with an open mind, on creating a sustainable future for people now and generations to come. A future where the vibrant communities thrive with economic and environmental sustainability.
Ben Dunbar-Smith
Hamilton Electorate
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
As a current Waikato Regional Councillor, I have seen first-hand the excesses with the council’s funding and programmes, and the unnecessary expenditure on things like Local Government NZ membership. That’s why I have joined the Rates Control Team for the 2025 elections in order to bring efficiencies to council’s spending.
If elected to council who are you working for?
The ratepayers. That’s why I’m standing on a policy platform of giving back $2.5 million in ratepayer money that was collected as “surplus”. However our team lost the vote to return this money, and reduce rates by 1.7% when the chairperson used her casting vote to not give this money back as a rates reduction.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
Yes
Will you vote to cap rates?
Yes. That’s what the Rates Control Team is about as a group. Times are tough for many people, and so it is time for regional council to tighten its belt.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
The Waikato economy is currently being propped up by the dairy and horticulture export payouts. In three years’ time, we have to hope that this economic boost is not dampened by American tariffs, or overly-restrict environmental conditions under PC1. As far as the measurement of economic prosperity goes, I will push for a robust economic analysis by an independent firm
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
I have worked as an economic development manager for a district council, and was responsible for analysing balance sheets, making funding bids, and providing detailed business cases for council expenditure in the millions of dollars. I am also PRINCE2 qualified in project management.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
Status quo
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
Undertake a line-by-line review of every department’s expenditure with a view to making reductions in spending in order to cap rates.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
Yes absolutely.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
None. This should be done with reallocation of staff within the organisation.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
The Regional Council has an important role to play in the management of the effects of climate change. This response to critical climate events such as the 2023 floods in the Coromandel/Waihou catchments (ie closing the Paeroa flood barrier at the bridge) is testament to the important work of staff in reducing the risks to human life from sudden flood events
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Koi carp are a significant, and often overlooked, environmental problem. Council staff are now talking about an action plan to deal with koi carp in WRC drains and waterways. This work needs to be informed by talking with the farmers who live in the area to ensure that practical and acceptable control methods are developed.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
This is a national issue, and needs to be addressed by central government in conjunction with the Climate Commission. Certainly if riparian planting could earn carbon credits, this would go a long way to funding farmers for retiring land and benefitting the environment.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
I am concerned that the feedback coming from some groups interviewed by regional council surveys in the Freshwater Policy Review (Phase 1) are completely unrealistic. when they require all waterways to be swimmable and suitable for food gathering within 5-10 years.
Yes, clean and swimmable water is important as a goal, but the question is within what timeframe. Also there are environmental factors such as koi carp who pollute the water, or towns and cities that have consent to have emergency discharges. There are many hurdles to overcome on this journey to pristine water, including the fact that so much of our water is iron-laden.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
Very important. It’s like insurance. The question moving forward is – given a potential change to the structure and function of regional councils being signalled by central government – is who should own these flood protection structures, who should be making decisions about their upkeep and expansion, and how does the wider community benefit get factored in.
Responder. Chris Hughes Hamilton City Constituent Candidate
Waikato Regional Council
I am standing for re election to WRC as there is much unfinished business.
My primary purpose is to ensure I leave New Zealand Inc in a better position when I depart than when I arrived. I have a similar objective with WRC. New Zealanders and the residents of Waikato all face unprecedented cost/inflation challenges. My objective is to ensure WRC limits its activities to only actions that a re required to protect our residents, help grow the economy and improve the environment.
I totally support the referendum on Maori Wards. Unfortunately WRC constituents are not required to vote on the option of retaining or removing the current 2 Maori Ward seats at WRC. If WRC councillors of like mind choose to require a referendum at the 2028 election, I would fully support that resolution. To achieve this we need 8 like minded councillors. In my view the Maori Ward members should not be allowed to vote on such a resolution.
I am a member of the Rates Control Team. Our stated policy is to cap rates at not more than the then level of inflation. We do however expect to be able to deliver rates increases below the level of inflation. Bear in mind the level of inflation is measured by a different basket of costs than those controlled by WRC, namely civil works and construction. As the current economic environment is very subdued I would expect WRC to contain costs below the basket of products used in the normal calculation of annual inflation growth.
If elected I will be working for the ratepayers.
Our policy is to cap rates at not more than the rate of inflation. Targeted rates in catchments can be difficult to limit to inflation due to valuation increases and the consequent increase in depreciation which has to be funded under current WRC policies.
I have no idea what the Waikato Settlement Act says about economic growth. My experience to date wit h settlement Acts is that they stifle economic growth by increasing costs but deliver no discernible tangible benefits to our economy.
As a retired chartered accountant I would like to believe I bring a very good
understanding of financial prudence and financial management to the council table . In fact I get criticised for only being interested in reducing
costs.
The chairs casting vote should always be for the status quo . Those are the
basic rules of good governance.
If I am re elected this will be my second term. The key issues for me will be to deliver on our Rates Control Team policies (Ratescontrolteam.co.nz) nz). Ideally I would like to see a total restructure and consolidation of local government in the Waikato region by formation of a unitary body . This must happen if we have the numbers to support such a change at WRC. This is the most important objective for me to deliver.
Yes. PC1 should never have been allowed to happen. Once again a chair using her casting vote.
No idea. Extra staff have already been employed to educate farmers on what they will need to do to ensure compliance with PC1. I will be advocating for systems generated compliance rather than extra staff.
The climate is always changing. If I were in charge of WRC all climate change activities would be ceased forthwith. Activities would be tailored to actual observed changes in our catchment, not predetermined activities based on hockey stick analysis. This is a national issue, not a local body activity.
Yes and I would like to encourage targeted eradication. I have a grandson who loves shooting them with a bow and arrow. This needs to be turned into a bounty activity. His team eradicated Koi Carp from the Stonehenge quarry lake in Auckland.
I don’t support rebates for riparian plantings. The loss of productive land should be reflected in the land valuation which has a direct impact on reducing rates. Less productive land means lower rates.
No. Impossible to achieve pristine water and efficient economic activity. There must be a balance that allows profitable food production while protecting the environment and our water quality. There will always need to be sensible compromise.
Flood protection across the region is important. Impossible to value without a major valuation exercise. Description of requirements is beyond the scope of this survey.
Jason Roxburgh, standing for the Thames-Coromandel Ward
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
I’m standing for the Thames-Coromandel ward to protect our environment, support sustainable industries, and ensure decisions serve long-term community interests. With decades of experience living and working on the Coromandel, and direct knowledge of WRC’s core functions, I understand the challenges landowners, communities, and the environment face. I’m committed to practical, transparent leadership in partnership with tangata whenua and communities.
If elected to council who are you working for?
I’ll be working for our communities and environment, which are inseparably linked. My role is to represent local voices while making decisions in the region’s best interests. That means serving ratepayers, iwi, landowners, businesses, and community groups, ensuring tangata whenua are partners, and being accountable to all Waikato residents on issues like flood protection, biosecurity, water quality, climate resilience, and sustainable land use.
Do you support the referendum on Māori Wards?
I support Māori wards because they provide fair representation and strengthen partnership with tangata whenua. I don’t support a binding referendum, as it applies a level of scrutiny not placed on any other
ward.
Will you vote to cap rates?
I’ll work to keep rates affordable and fair, but I don’t support a fixed cap. Strict limits could undermine essential services or emergency response. Instead, I support careful spending, prioritising core services, finding efficiencies, and ensuring rates are transparent, justified, and sustainable.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
A robust economy sustains livelihoods, adapts to challenges, and protects natural systems. Key measures in the Act include environmental health, economic resilience, community wellbeing, climate and infrastructure readiness, and strong partnership with tangata whenua.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
I’ve managed large budgets and resources in both public and not-for-profit sectors. As WRC’s Waihou-Piako Zone Manager I oversaw operational budgets and projects delivering value for ratepayers. With DOC I managed capital and operational expenditure, and I’ve run my own small business. This background equips me to ensure transparent, practical, and fiscally responsible decision-making on WRC’s budget.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
Best practice is to use the casting vote for the status quo, so major changes proceed only with clear majority support. This protects the integrity of decision-making and the Chair’s neutral role. If a Chair votes for change, they should clearly explain their reasoning to maintain trust.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
Delivering core services effectively and transparently while building trust with communities and tangata whenua. That means sound financial management, strong performance in flood protection, biodiversity, biosecurity, river management, and climate resilience, and fostering a culture of partnership, accountability, and innovation.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
I support avoiding unnecessary costs for ratepayers but not losing momentum on water quality. While formal processes may pause, WRC should keep working with landowners, iwi, and communities on practical freshwater improvements. We should pause costly steps likely to be redundant, but continue on-the-ground action.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
The Environment Court have indicated that we should expect a decision by late 2025. Only once Council adopts a final plan can the CEO develop an implementation strategy. What matters is ensuring WRC has the right mix of skilled staff across science, planning, compliance, and engagement, with
transparent reporting. I won’t speculate before that process is complete.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Both. Central government sets policy and funding, while regional councils turn that direction into local action. WRC must lead in climate resilience, protecting people, the economy, and the environment.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Yes. Koi carp damage water quality, habitats, and ecosystems. Eradication is unrealistic regionally, but control is possible through containment, targeted reduction, and protection of high-value sites. DOC holds statutory responsibility for pest fish and must step up. WRC should continue to work with DOC, iwi, landowners, and communities on practical, affordable control that doesn’t over-burden ratepayers.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
Yes. Landowners who retire land for riparian and biodiversity protection should be fairly compensated for lost economic value. This supports sustainable land management, biodiversity, and water quality.
I’m not convinced pre-retirement LEV is the best tool, as its use in biodiversity hasn’t been properly explored, and future mechanisms like biodiversity credits may be more effective.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
This depends on how you define “pristine, and “all waterways”. I don’t think achieving truly “pristine” water in all waterways is realistic, given historic land use and urbanisation. But we can and must work to significantly improve water quality across the region. That means focusing on priority catchments, working with landowners and tangata whenua, improving riparian planting and land management, investing in science and monitoring, and ensuring practical, community-led action delivers healthier rivers and streams over time.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
Very high. Flood protection is a core WRC’s responsibility, underpinning safety, resilience, and prosperity. Effective catchment and drainage management reduces risks to life, property, and infrastructure, protects farmland, and saves costs long term. Well-planned, modern systems also help keep insurance affordable and give communities confidence to plan for the future.
Keith Holmes
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
To use my experience to make a difference and to do this, it is better to be inside the “Tent than outside the Tent”
If elected to council who are you working for?
Our Customers who are the Rate Payers
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
The issue of co-governance needs to be “put to bed”,though creating a twin headed governance monster is quite different from the original intent of genuine assessment and assimilation of Maori values
Will you vote to cap rates?
Capping Rates is a simplistic way of demanding much needed governance excellence. Our Rate Payers are being “bleed” by poor Governance, a rigid regulatory culture and central Govt. shifting responsibilities to rate payers without the Tax Dollars to pay for them
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
Can’t reference the Waikato Settlement Act.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
Have been self employed for nearly 50 years, been a company Director of multiple companies for 30 years, can read a Balance Sheet and very capable of being decisive. WRC run as a private business could remove 40% of the current operating budget.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
Use of the casting vote generally denotes poor governance. A good governing Chair will generally refer an item back to the Committee so as to get more clarity to achieve a clear majority.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
The CEO is required to formulate and carry out the wishes of the Board [read Council]. The incoming Council needs set it’s Vision and Strategy and it is the CEO’s role to carry it out. This Term is going to have massive challenges in terms of Central Govt. directives for change. Hence both the Council and the CEO have to be holistic in carrying out their responsibilities
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
There are so many unknowns with the new RMA [Resource Management Act version 3 2026] and much of the ancillary legislation that is also interlocked. The Govt. has repeatedly asked Council to not proceed but technically PC1 is in the hands of the Environment Court and the incumbent legislation including the Treaty of Waitangi, so it is a “Catch 22” situation for Council. With good leadership, Council should be making “haste slowly” so as to allow the raft of the new legislation [regardless of the Govt. in power] to work in synch.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
Unable to answer that as it is still before the Environment Court and the Interim decision is in a state of flux
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Under current legislation, Regional Councils are responsible for the passage of water, the responsibility lies with them. In terms of that and depending on the New RMA, the Council need to continue to build regional resilience and hopefully with the traditional equal balance between, Social, Economic and Environmental factors
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Yes and it is an extremely serious environmental calamity. The problem needs “elevation” to the status of Possum eradication and control, as Koi Carp are our “Possums of the Waterways”. It requires both DOC, WRC, MfE and Central Govt. to “own” the problem. .
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
If society demands land use change, it needs to front up with the cash – anything less is theft of property rights and an offence to “natural justice”. Regional Council needs to negotiate with Central Govt. some form of co funding for compensation for any deemed “at risk” catchments to be “retired”
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
No and it is not achievable even if we remove all people from the Waikato and NZ, due to our geology, our landscape, our living in the “Shaky Ilses”. We can however collectively be good citizens and custodians of our land, cities, villages and waterways, and this is best done via a “culture of Care” and not by the current draconian regulation
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
Our ancestor came to a fragile floating swamp in the Waikato and made it good, prosperous and a pleasant place to live. We owe it to them and our children, our Mokopuna to carry on the vision and enhancement
Lyndsay Algra:
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
I need a job, but seriously it’s because I believe I am the best candidate.
If elected to council who are you working for?
My friends, family and wider community.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
My lineage goes back 7 generations, currently we are 8 generations, soon to be 9 generations. I think Maori Wards are simply racist.
Will you vote to cap rates?
Hard to say, but I certainly don’t want to raise rates, or invest rate payers money to extract more money from ratepayers which tends to be from the poorest in the community.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
The dissolution of monitoring bodies, this shouldn’t be a question. What I mean by that is no one is monitoring the level of robustnesss of the All Blacks team because they are world leaders in Rugby. So to me, achieving that status of a robust regional economy means those monitoring would be out of the job because it has been achieved for decades to come.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
I was running my own electrical business at 19, I know what is required from quotes, to manpower, to materials. I bought bitcoin at $10 each, i really don’t know what to say but you can’t just throw money are your problems and hope the person who takes it will solve everything.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
The elected councillors vote on who is the Chair, I’d like to think it’s someone experienced who takes the position seriously.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
Getting passenger train services from the Port to Hamilton, Buses between the likes of Morrinsville, Matamata, Tauranga, Hamilton are not creating oppatunities.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
Not specifically, when money is tied up in banks, earning minimal interest, it’s not in circulation in our regional communities getting taxed and put back into the community. We need circulation of tax and rates capital, rather than having it sitting in some international bank for them to gamble with on stock markets which undermine the profits of the workers who are creating real wealth.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
I would hope we can make some stuff redundant, because councillors should be all over these reforms. Why would you hire someone, when we are all going to be the playing field of new legislation?
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Climate change is a bit like cancer, a trigger word void of any understanding. Lots of different types of cancer, just like climate change could simply be the difference between Summer and Winter. Lets just say that I am highly interested in weather modification techniques and while the News can’t even get the weather correct in 24 hours time, I am increasingly finding my phone saying its raining in Morrinsville when there are blue skies. So in terms of actions taken by the regional council, it’s really about supporting our farmers by optimizing rainfall in desired locations if we can, otherwise its about getting good data to the people who can utilize it like our farmers.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
There is a comparable issue in the United States relating to Asian Carp population that just obliterated every other species, they actually implemented an electric fence within the water to keep this species from spreading. I think the first action is understanding the problem, then traveling to the USA to understand solutions and then attempting to implement the best practices here. I found the story in the USA very interesting.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
My mother doesn’t have her entire backyard, 1/3 of it is an open storm water drain. I most certainly would consider it, taxing people for land that the council has basically claimed is rather dishonest, they approved the subdivision, the building, its like making you pay rates on the footpath in front of your house.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region?
If so how would you achieve this? No i don’t, i think there will always be pollution, it’s just the nature of the chemistry of water, water dissolves most salts. Certainly one of the most universal solvents, but I think with the use of fresh water springs, desalination plants, and filtration systems, we can most certainly dilute any pollution. To give you an example, pre WW2 ships are salvaged for their steel, its called low background steel and they use it for things like MRI and CT scanners. This steel is desired because of the post 1945 radiation from nuclear detonations that spread globally and now containates all new steel production. We are of course talking atomic scales, but I think it really highlights the difficulty of removing pollution.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
On the WRC facebook page they promoted one of their tools relating to flooding, based on tidal levels. When I asked about coastal erosion and the raising of the sea bed, they said they would get back to me. Lets just say in terms of value, i would opt to dredge that coastal erosion from the sea bed and put it back onto land, reclaiming it. This would have a cost to biodiversity, but I believe that is a cost I’d be willing to pay to stop regional flood events and personally I think we can increase biodiversity in the aftermath of any sort of human interference within micro organisms habitats at that large scale. Ultimately, it does seem there is a void within the council relating to the root causes of flooding, I’m not sure if it’s money, if it’s lobby groups, but I’m here to represent the humans in our community, not a microorganism or private profits and I make no apologies for that.
Noel Smith WRC Waikato Constituency
Pam Chiles.
Thank you for your questions. They are very pertinent to your activities. Water is a vital resource for all, both for humans and all other forms of life. It is great to know that there are those who are working towards protecting the quality of the water which we need and use daily.
Here are my answers to your questions:
My main concern is with public transport because air quality is benefitted when less people use private cars. I wish to make public transport easier to use and so reduce dependency on cars.
If elected, I will be working for the people and all life forms of the region.
I support the referendum on Maori Wards. I condemn discrimination in any form. I understand why Maori Wards are in place. They provide greater representation for Maori who have been perceived as being marginalised. This was true in the past but I believe it is no longer the case. I fully understand that this opinion could be construed as politically incorrect.
Nobody wants to pay more rates but there is a requirement for all buses to be electric by 2035. They are more expensive than the diesel buses we now have, so rates may have to be raised to pay for them so I won’t vote to cap rates.
Economics requires a difficult balancing act. People have to have enough money not only to survive but also to pursue their interests. I cannot state in monetary terms what a ‘robust’ regional economy would be, but when people are able to live in happiness and freedom without worrying constantly about money, I would consider that to be a successful region economically.
My only financial experience is managing to live on a shoestring for most of my life without going into debt.
The casting vote should be for whatever the Chairperson feels is appropriate to the situation.
The most important thing for the CEO is transparency in the decision-making process of the council.
PC1 is an important move to benefit the health of rivers in the region which is vital to the health of us all. It is a plan that should not be delayed.
I don’t know how many extra staff will be needed to implement this plan.
Climate change is both a national and regional responsibility. The regional council needs to monitor pollution levels in waterways and the air; and work to maintain standards set nationally.
Koi Carp are an invasive species and have the potential to cause huge damage to our waterways. The public should be alerted to this threat by advertising which shows what they look like and where they have been seen. Then if people see them, they can inform pest control officers who can eradicate them. Moreover, anglers should be encouraged to catch them.
The vast majority of people support biodiversity protection regardless of incentives such as rates rebates. These kinds of monetary encouragements are expensive to administer and are prone to abuse so I don’t support rates rebates.
Pristine water is achievable. Relentless monitoring and effective laws to curb polluters at sources both focused and diffuse is how it can be accomplished.
After the destruction caused by cyclone Gabrielle, flood protection has gained a renewed emphasis throughout the country. It is crucial.
Stu Kneebone responses (candidate, Waipa-King Country)
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
Because I have a strong community ethic, enjoy the work, am passionate about the work the Regional Council does and I want to make a difference.
If elected to council who are you working for?
The ratepayers and the region/community.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
No, can’t see the point of spending money on a referendum.
a) WRC introduced Māori wards under the leadership of Peter Buckley over 12 years ago. They have been in place for 4 terms (12 years) now and they have been very effective, particularly given the River Settlement legislation and the obligations it confers on WRC.
b) Why single out Councils? The Government is not holding a referendum on the Central Govt Māori seats and/or the right to be on the Māori roll and vote for Central Govt Māori MPs.
Will you vote to cap rates?
No. A very blunt instrument that would cause issues for all sorts of things, including funding for critical flood protection infrastructure. The only way to avoid cost increases is to stop investing into the region – not something I am in support of. Funding mechanisms for Councils across the country are not fit for purpose and many Councils rate increases are clearly not sustainable, however a rates cap will not address this.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
I’m assuming you are referring to the “Waikato-Taiuni Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010”?
I would comment that 3 years is a short timeframe relative to the 80 years that we are currently working towards to give effect to Te Ture Whaimana. Giving effect to Te Ture Whaimana for the Waikato/Waipa rivers is clearly going to be challenging, particularly from an economic perspective. While the Vision & Strategy is not negotiable, we can ensure that the time period for implementation minimizes the economic impact. However I would comment that three years is not long enough to effectively measure the economic impact of PC1
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
NB – not sure where your figure of $152.584 was obtained (think your figure is based on rate income???)
FYI – total WRC cost of service budget for the AP 2025-26 year is $222.213 million.
Self employed as a sharemilker and farm owner/manager for 35 years.
Experienced Waikato Regional Councillor. Member of Finance committee.
Co Chair Waikato River Authority.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
As a general rule, the convention has always been that it be used to maintain the status quo which is where I tend to sit. However every situation needs to be judged on it’s merits. My observations over time is that we can sometimes have different interpretations of what the “status quo” means.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
Regardless if whether it is my first term or not, the CEO has the same job to do. That is work with Councillors to agree on a strategic direction, and then put in place an appropriate plan to deliver on this, with clear KPI’s agreed to with Council. And work to agree on an appropriate LTP budget to deliver on that. I would be expecting the CEO to action an appropriate induction programme for new Councillors, to provide Council with sound and timely advice, and subsequently implement council decisions, and manage the council operations etc.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
To the best of my knowledge, the government has not issued a directive to hold off implementing plans such as PC1. If they have, I would like to see it??
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
As we don’t yet know the final content/shape of PC1, it’s hard to know.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Both Regional and National. Regional Council should be managing it’s own corporate emissions in a responsible way. It should be encouraging/supporting people/businesses/landusers to minimize/reduce their emissions when relevant to the work and responsibilities of the Regional Council and also helping these groups/individuals to adapt to the impacts of climate change when appropriate. A good example is working with coastal communities to help them adapt and respond to sea level rise and the various impacts associated with this.
A another example is Councils various catchment enhancement programmes where good opportunities exist to assist farmers to offset their emissions with their riparian and hill country tree planting work. WRCs responsibilities with regard to flood protection, coastal management, land management and community safety all necessitate that it takes a proactive approach to ensuring the impacts of climate change are factored into its decision making (eg, flood protection asset maintenance/renewal, coastal planning, urban development/infrastructure etc), and that appropriate adaptation measures are implemented.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Yes, I am well aware of the impact of Koi Carp and the ongoing impact it has. I have supported efforts to date that have been underpinned by robust evidence to justify investment in research looking for solutions. But my understanding is that to date,
solutions have not been forthcoming. Always open to new proposals to investigate solutions, providing those undertaking the research can demonstrate a good business case that justifies ratepayer investment.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
I am unaware of the term “pre-retirement Land Expectation Value” and how it is calculated, so hard to comment. If you could explain, it would be helpful.
However I am generally supportive of the concept of rates rebates for things such as efforts to enhance biodiversity. But there are challenges, as for every rate dollar rebated, that dollar has to be made up from somewhere else, which generally means rates rises on the remaining “rateable” portion of the region. So there are limits as to how far one can take this approach. However it can be a really useful and encouraging tool to assist in encouraging good/appropriate landuse.
I also note that there is increasing interest and investment in a “biodiversity credits” approach to rewarding investment in biodiversity enhancement mahi. This is something I really support, and think WRC and others should be looking really hard at.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
Depends on what your definition of “pristine water” is. If pristine means pre-human arrival water quality in NZ, then no I do not believe it is achievable.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
Depends on what the flood protection infrastructure is looking to protect. If it’s good farmland that can make a contribution to Waikato Inc whilst meeting community agreed contaminant discharge standards, and the farm business is profitable, then to my mind it’s a worthwhile investment. But if it can’t do those things, then questions need to be asked.
But there are a bunch of other values from flood protection infrastructure, such as the protection of roading, housing, urban centres and so on. A robust cost benefit analysis should always be done before embarking on any sort of renewal of these assets. To not do so would be completely unfair on those who fund the infrastructure.
Walt Cavendish
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
I’m standing for the Waikato Regional Council because someone has to. Rates keep climbing, consultants keep feeding, and the council keeps losing touch with the people who pay the bills. At just under 40, I bring something different, the experience of farming and raising a young family, with the energy and drive to fight for the next generation. I’m not here for the old boys’ club, the wink-and-nod deals, or another round of wasted spending. I’m here to be independent, to cut the fat, and to give ratepayers a voice that actually bites. After all, a watchdog that won’t bark is nothing more than a pet.
If elected to council, who are you working for?
I’ll be working for the people who pay the bills, the ratepayers of Waikato. Not the consultants, not the insiders, not the old boys’ club. Every dollar the council spends comes out of your pocket, and I’ll treat it with the same respect you do. My loyalty isn’t for sale, and my vote won’t be traded. I’ll answer only to the people because if you can’t bark for the ratepayer, you’re just another pet for the system.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
Yes, I support a referendum on Māori wards. Something as important as how we choose our representatives should not be decided by councillors in back rooms, it should be decided by the people at the ballot box.
Will you vote to cap rates?
Yes I will vote to cap rates. Ratepayers aren’t an ATM for council’s wish-lists. Families are tightening their belts in my community while the council spends like a drunken sailor. If elected, I’ll back a hard cap to force discipline, stop the endless hikes, and make the council live within its means.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
I’ll judge the Waikato economy ‘robust’ on three simple measures: that families can afford their rates, that farmers can afford to farm, and that businesses are creating jobs rather than closing their doors.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
Council’s budget for 2025–2026 is $152.584 million and every cent comes from ratepayers. My financial experience comes from farming: balancing tight budgets, managing staff, and planning ahead through volatility. On the farm, if the numbers don’t add up, the bills don’t get paid. That discipline is exactly what’s missing at council. I’ll bring real-world accountability to the table because when I waste money, I pay. When the council wastes money it’s ratepayers who pay. And that has to stop.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
A casting vote by the Chairperson should always go to the status quo. Why? Because change should only happen when there’s a clear majority in favour not because one person tips the scales.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
The number one thing the WRC CEO must achieve in my first term is earning back the trust of ratepayers. That means cutting waste, keeping rates under control, and proving that every dollar is spent on core council business, not vanity projects, not consultants’ reports, and not bloated bureaucracy.
Do you support the Government’s directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
Yes, I support holding off on Plan Change 1 until the new legislation is in place. It makes no sense to rush farmers and ratepayers into costly rules that could soon be scrapped.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
None. I don’t believe WRC should be ballooning its payroll to roll out PC1. Ratepayers are already stretched
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Climate change is a shared responsibility. The council’s job is local action flood protection, resilient infrastructure, and smarter land use. No vanity projects, no waste just practical steps that protect communities and ratepayers.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Yes koi carp are a big threat to our rivers and lakes. I’m not going to pretend to be the expert on how to get rid of them however as this is not in my area of knowledge.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
Yes, if land is retired for the public good, then ratepayers deserve a fair rebate. Council shouldn’t preach about biodiversity on one hand and punish landowners on the other.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
No, pristine water everywhere is a political slogan, not a practical goal. What matters is swimmable rivers, drinkable water, and real improvements people can actually see. I’d achieve this by focusing council on practical steps of targeted riparian planting, smart regulation, and working with landowners instead of against them.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
Flood protection is not optional, it’s core business. Every dollar of ratepayers money council spends on flood resilience protects homes, farms, and livelihoods.
Bruce Clarkson, Hamilton Constituency
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
My background in environmental science is highly relevant to the regional councillor role, with more than 40 years of experience working at the interface of research, policy and practice. I have a strong track record of helping community groups and iwi to achieve their aspirations in sustaining our land, water and environment. There are many challenging issues confronting the Waikato and New Zealand. If re-elected I want to assist the Waikato Regional Council to perform to its full potential. I seek to use my skills and expertise to help us take a more collaborative evidence-based approach to the challenges ahead. I want to focus on outcomes which ensure we do not compromise future generations’ inheritance and wellbeing.
If elected to council who are you working for?
The constituency of Hamilton and for the Region as a whole.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
No, I don’t think it is necessary. I have supported Maaori Wards since they were introduced under the leadership of Peter Buckley. When he was the chair of WRC I had an excellent working relationship with him. I note that rural constituencies in the Council provide a voice for rural people that might otherwise be overwhelmed by urban dwellers. In the same way Maaori Wards give Maaori a voice at the table. I think there is too much scaremongering about this reasonable concession to the Treaty partner.
Will you vote to cap rates?
No, I will not. This blunt instrument has been tried in Australia and was not successful. A balanced approach to thriftiness and financial prudence and not under-investing in ways that compromise future generations is required. Hamilton City is currently paying the price of a period of dominance by rates control members. Think of under-investment in infrastructure, particularly wastewater treatment and deferred maintenance.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
This one is too cryptic for me. You need to explain.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
As Deputy Vice Chancellor Research at the University of Waikato, I had full responsibility for a Research and Development budget of $73 M per annum and all aspects of research, enterprise, commercialisation, IP protection, research, postgraduate and scholarships offices.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
Generally, for the status quo but I would say it’s not set in concrete- depends on context.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
The CE has already achieved a good deal in my first term. He has with the help of the Councillors taken a balanced approach to serving the interests of the whole region.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
We are taking a pragmatic approach following the current legislation approach at present.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
A hypothetical question dependent on Central Government decisions but minimal extra staff.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
It’s a local, regional and national responsibility. The first priority will be to protect Waikato citizens from increasing storm frequency and extreme weather events. After that it will be mitigation and adaptation measures for longer term resilience.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Yes, Koi carp are a problem but they are primarily symptomatic of eutrophication of lakes and the enhanced nutrient status of some waterways – that’s where their biomass is greatest. A solution will require catchment scale reductions of lake eutrophication and cross agency control – DOC is responsible for Koi carp management.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
I support incentives and/or credits for progress in this space. But I would be hoping that progressive farmers would not be making a case for payments disproportionate to what would be considered good farming practice.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
This is a loaded and unhelpful question. It depends on what your baseline is for pristine i.e. prehuman settlement. Every catchment should be working towards improvement of the water quality there and making full use of the science-based evidence relating to critical thresholds of water quality.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
Retention and enhancement will be needed given the projected climate change impacts. But there will be thresholds met where it is uneconomic to provide the level of protection that may be required, and adaptation strategies will be needed.
Garry Reymer
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
Because the growth in the WRC cannot continue while just adding compliance and regulation to landowners. Local government needs major reform
If elected to council who are you working for?
Ratepayers
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
Yes
Will you vote to cap rates?
Yes
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
New infrastructure projects
GDP per capita growth
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
I have run a successful farm business for 40 years. I know how to respect the hard earnt dollar. Understand the dynamic of setting a budget and holding a CEO to account.
Had finance roles in school boards, as well as Finance and economics at Waikato Federated farmers. Completed Mayfield Governace program as well as Rabobank Executive development Program
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
Status quo
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
Complete amalgamation of local government councils into a yet to be decided structure but one that does not have 3 layers of government, central, regional and district.
Cap Rates
Reduce staff by a minimum of 5%
Flag that WRC will stop funding Te Huia
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
100% yes
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
Zero is the answer, which is different to how many would management want to employ? And the answer to that would be limitless apart from the size of the building.
They are already over staffed so would have to make do with current numbers.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Difficult to answer. My starting point would be that we work on management of the effects of climate change not mitigation. Management is both local and national, but a big part is up to WRC, drainage, flood protection and the like. These manage effects and are already mandated
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
I do understand that it is a problem but don’t have a good understanding of the damage or impact or have thoughts on how to eradicate them. Something I would be happy to look into and take advice on.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
By that I assume you mean the ability of the land to earn. Interesting point. My thoughts would be that capital value rates are wrong anyway, as well as rates based on cashflow of an individual or entity. Rates should be service based, so hard to give a good answer.
In Principle yes
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
No, so much of our water is iron laden so you will never have them pristine. But if towns and cities didn’t have consent to have many emergency discharges per year it would help
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
Dollar value? I cant say but flood protection is important, it’s like insurance, you hope you never need it but are very thankful if disaster arrives. Also part of my thinking around climate change, we need to manage the effects rather than control the climate
Deb Mair
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
I bring a unique blend of technical expertise, community understanding, and a deep commitment to the long-term health of our environment. I’m stepping up, to work alongside others and lead constructive change in a sector facing challenging times – building trust, listening carefully, and finding common ground to achieve results. I’d bring scientific literacy, regional insight, and a evidence-based approach to governance. Always working for the wellbeing of people, the lake and the land, now and into the future.
If elected to council who are you working for?
The people of my constituency.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
I can see how Māori wards could strengthen representation, but I want to understand more about how they’ll work in practice before deciding. We currently have 2 ward and I will continue to support them.
Will you vote to cap rates?
It’s difficult to cap rates when we are experiencing more rain events and natural disasters that may require financing in the future
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
The Settlement Act requires us to look after the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River while also ensuring the regional economy remains robust. For me, the two are interconnected. A degraded river undermines our economy, while a thriving economy should support environmental and cultural wellbeing. In three years, I would judge a ‘robust’ Waikato economy using measures that show both economic vitality and sustainability. For example:
Economic measures: steady regional GDP growth, diversification of industries (not just dependence on dairy), strong local employment rates, and growing Māori enterprise and co-investment.
Environmental measures: measurable improvements in water quality, reduced contaminant loads, and increased investment in restoration, because an economy that erodes its natural capital isn’t robust.
Social measures: reduced inequality, particularly closing the gaps in education, employment, and health outcomes for Māori, and ensuring young people see opportunities to stay and thrive in the region.
Resilience measures: climate adaptation progress, such as land-use changes, renewable energy uptake, and reduced vulnerability to floods, droughts, and global market shocks.
Robustness also means fairness. In three years I’d want to see Māori voices and Māori businesses strongly represented in regional economic planning, so that the Waikato economy reflects partnership and shared prosperity.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
I recognise that $152 million in annual spending is a serious responsibility, and good governance requires both financial literacy and a strategic lens. I’ve read the Long Term Plan and I understand how council budgets are structured across operating expenditure, capital investment, and debt management. In my professional roles I’ve been responsible for managing multi-year project budgets, negotiating contracts, and ensuring projects
deliver within scope and cost. That means I’m comfortable reading financial reports, asking the right questions, and understanding the risks behind the numbers.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
I don’t think it should be automatic. A chair should weigh the issue. If it’s a high-risk change without broad support, I’d lean to the status quo. It’s important for all Councilors to discuss openly the reasons for voting the way that they do, to ensure everyone understands the facts. But if it’s an urgent matter where delay creates bigger costs or risks, I’d support change.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
The most important thing for the CEO to achieve in my first term is delivering visible progress on freshwater health — because it’s central to our region’s wellbeing, economy, and obligations under Te Mana o te Wai. As councillors we set the direction, and I’d hold the CEO accountable for ensuring resources, staff, and programmes are aligned to achieve that goal, while maintaining financial sustainability.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
I understand the Government’s concern about costs and duplication, but we can’t afford to lose momentum on improving water quality. I’d support a pragmatic approach. Pausing the most costly regulatory steps until legislation is clearer, but continuing the catchment work, monitoring, and community engagement so we’re ready to move quickly once the framework is confirmed.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
I don’t believe it’s my role to put a number on staff. PC1 is complex, and yes, the Council will need extra capacity, in compliance, science, and community engagement. But whether that’s new staff or contracted expertise needs to be justified through robust business cases. My role as a councillor is to scrutinise those requests and make sure ratepayer money is being used effectively while still delivering the outcomes for water quality we’ve promised.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Climate change is both a national and regional responsibility. The Government sets the framework, but it’s the Regional Council that deals with the on-the-ground impacts. Whether that’s flooding, drought, or the pressures on our ecosystems. I believe the most important role for the Regional Council is to build resilient communities: that means robust risk planning, clear public communication, and practical actions like restoring wetlands, supporting sustainable land use, and preparing for severe weather. Our communities need to know the risks and be supported to adapt. That’s where regional leadership is critical.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Yes, koi carp are a serious threat to our waterways. They stir up sediment, damage habitat, and put native species at risk. While eradication across the whole region isn’t realistic, we can take strong action: preventing their spread, targeting removal where it makes the most difference, annual bowhunters koi carp competition, investing in new technologies, and supporting community and iwi-led initiatives. Public education is also vital, because human movement of fish is one of the biggest risks. For me, the Regional Council’s role is to lead that coordination so our restoration efforts aren’t undermined by this pest.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
Yes, I would support this initiative. Providing rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value is a smart way to recognise the real cost landowners take on when they choose restoration over production. It’s fair, it encourages the right kind of land use change, and ultimately
it’s an investment in healthier rivers, stronger biodiversity, and more resilient communities. I think it’s a very good initiative and one that aligns with the outcomes our communities want to see.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region?
If so how would you achieve this? In today’s climate, with high runoff, contaminants, erosion, and ageing infrastructure, achieving pristine water in all waterways is not realistically achievable. That said, we can make a huge difference by focusing on what we can improve: restoring riparian zones and wetlands, supporting sustainable land use, upgrading wastewater and stormwater systems, and engaging communities and iwi in stewardship.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
I place very high value on retaining and enhancing flood protection in the region. Effective flood management protects lives, property, farmland, and infrastructure, and is essential for community and economic resilience. As climate change increases the frequency and severity of extreme weather, it’s vital that the Regional Council continues to invest in evidence-based, resilient flood protection schemes and works closely with communities and iwi to deliver them safely and effectively.
Phillip Westwood
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
Phil: Now that I have retired and have more time available I have decided to stand for Waikato regional council in order to contribute to a region that I had been given a lot when I worked in Hamilton.
If elected to council who are you working for?
Phil: I will be working for all the residents and ratepayers and believe that the best results can be achieved with a harmonious and co-operative committee.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
Phil: I support the referendum on Maori Wards, but I would like to see more done to encourage people to participate so that a stronger message is sent to the government.
Will you vote to cap rates?
Phil: It is my view that rates should be capped, but they should not be capped at a flat dollar figure. They should be capped at a base figure plus CPI increase each year. To cap at a base figure only with no increase in that figure, would result in a lowering of services as if you have inflation (CPI) then you are unable to provide the same level of services as you have not provided for inflation.
It is also my view that there should be a fund established for capital replacements on assets lasting more than five years so that people using those assets now are contributing to their replacement in the future. The fund should have restriction so that it can only be used for assets lasting more than five years and this would reduce the need for raising funds by borrowing.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
Phil: I have a Bachelor of Commerce degree from Auckland University with major in accounting, plus I worked as an accountant for companies in England and New Zealand.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
Phil: Judging whether the “Regional economy is robust” by definition will involve economic and financial assessments. To me these would be a. Employment. Total number of people working and the unemployment rate b. Number of small businesses in the region as the majority of new employment is create by small firms. Large corporations have the financial resources to use capital rather than labour.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
Phil: I do not believe that the chairperson should be required to vote for the status quo but should encourage further consideration to get a decision. If they are still unable to get a decision they should have the same right as other committee members to vote as they see best.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
Phil: I believe flood protection should be enhanced and having been through the trauma of having my home flooded I can understand and sympathise with the people who have been through this. In some cases this may involve dredging river and clearing river bars (as with the Wairoa River and bar or enhancing stop banks so that water flow is not impeded. But it should also look to the future and restrict development on flood prone land.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
Phil: Yes I support the govt directive to hold off implementing for PC1 (Plan for Change 1). PC1 had appeals lodged in mid 2020 and an interim decision on 28 may 2025. There is still no final decision or a bill proposed for Parliament. I think it is highly unlikely that these will be completed and passed into legislation in the current government’s term.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
Phil: I question how can you prepare for implementing a plan or estimate the number of staff you will need when the legislation has not been passed and you don’t know what the responsibilities of the council will be.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Phil: Traditionally “Climate Change” has been viewed as a national issue covered by the government and ACC because a lot of climate change (eg: 2023 Auckland Floods) has been caused by weather outside of NZ. Now it appears that they are trying to transfer this responsibility to local authorities, without transferring the funding for that additional funding.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Phil: Koi Carp are too widespread for eradication to be viable without huge damage to all waterway biodiversity: fish, shellfish, birds and vegetation. Attempting to contain, as is being done at present, is the only realistic choice.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
Phil: A decision on what compensation is going to be paid for land retired for riparian rights and biodiversity protection , plus flood prone land. Will depend on who the land vests in after settlement, and what economic activity, if any, the land can be used for in the future. I do not believe that future settlements like the Auckland Flood Prone Land Purchase Scheme are either viable or practical, and the Auckland Council still has no stated plan as to what it will do with the 1200 properties it is acquiring.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
Phil: Pristine water. No I do not believe that “pristine water” is achievable. Firstly, what is pristine? The Collins dictionary defines pristine as “involving the original unchanged and unspoilt period or state”. With the industrial and economic development in the region (freezing works, pulp and paper mills, farming) together with urban development and population growth that is not possible. But we have legislation in place to minimize the damage and where there are breaches eg discharges of effluent by industry or human waste by waste treatment plants the fines should be heavy enough to actively discourage organization from polluting. Referring to Auckland again, the effluent discharges into the harbour by WaterCare are so small in comparison to the costs of compliance that there is no financial incentive to comply.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
Phil: I believe flood protection should be enhanced and having been through the trauma of having my home flooded I can understand and sympathise with the people who have been through this. In some cases this may involve dredging river and clearing river bars (as with the Wairoa River and bar or enhancing stop banks so that water flow is not impeded. But it should also look to the future and restrict development on flood prone land
Debbie Davies
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council? –
I believe in the environment, and have had the privilege of working alongside the team at WRC, who do a great job in this domain. I would like to be a part of this.
If elected to the council who are you working for?
My electorate (Taupō/Rotorua), which has the faith to vote for me in the 1st instance, and then the wider WRC
Do you support the referendum on Māori Wards?
As a Māori, it would be remiss of me not to, but I also am a big advocate for General Wards as well, hence why I have put my name forward for this general seat
Will you vote to cap rates?
As I am a ratepayer, I will definitely consider all the avenues connected to Rates
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
If you mean the Waikato-Tainui Claims Settlement Act, my understanding is that they are one of the 4 biggest Iwi who have helped Aotearoa’s (NZ) growth economically. I believe that if we look at Hamilton alone, this Settlement Act has helped the economic growth soar.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
I currently sit as the Audit and Risk Chair for a large Trust and have done so for many years, and sit as a Director with a large Commercial Board worth over $200 million.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
Status Quo
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
That the KPI’s set by the last triennium have been met to his best ability
Do you support the Government’s directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
No – I believe a lot of good work went into this with excellent collaboration between the Community, Stakeholders, and Local Government.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
As I am not sitting in the term, my knowledge would be limited; however, after speaking with others, including staff, perhaps 1-5, if any, or none. I would assume that staff from the beginning of this kaupapa will have been integrated into WRC, and hopefully should be easy to recall back on if required.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
It is both a National and Regional responsibility. No one knows their region better than themselves. Nationally, working together helps resources reach the right places.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so, what action do you believe should be taken to address the problem?
My only knowledge of these fish is what I have googled and asking questions;
(Koi carp cause habitat loss for plants, native fish, invertebrates, and waterfowl. They can also worsen river erosion by undermining banks as they feed.)
I do recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp. Unfortunately, I am not an expert on the eradication of koi carp, and will rely on kōrero and actions with WRC
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
I like to believe I will support. It’s a good action plan for landowners. I would consider what and why rates are set as if I were elected.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so, how would you achieve this?
I believe waterways in Waikato could, in some places, and I believe PC1 will help towards that happening.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
High value, but I don’t think it should only be WRC. Local District Councils need to do the same to reset their value, as they are the ones who give Resource consents for Land use.
Gary McGuire
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
1/ I am concerned about the ever rising “Cost of Living Crisis”, causing pain in our communities.
WRC Rates are a big part of what is fuelling this.
2/ In my opinion “Plan Change 1” is the biggest threat to Farmers & Commercial Growers, that we have experienced in our lifetime. I will do everything in my power to help our people in this battle for their survival.
•
If elected to council who are you working for?
The Rate Payers.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
Yes 100 %
Will you vote to cap rates?
Yes 100%
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
?
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
I have run my own businesses successfully as a Farmer, Commercial Grower, Company Director & currently as a sole trader running my small Demolition Business. I always live within my means & I believe that Waikato Regional Council must do the same, stick to tight budgets, stay within the parameters of its core business & put an end to unnecessary spending.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
Status Quo
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
1/ Tightly Control Spending Rate Payers Money.
2/ Control his staff, Review employment contracts if necessary.
3/ Abide by the specific parameters that Council is there to oversee, not allow staff to stray off on personal or political agenda’s.
4/ Uphold the directives of the Elected Council who represent the Rate Payers.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
Yes 100 %
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
No More At All. “ Zero “
PC 1 I believe must be reined in & bought back to reality. Or NZ as we know it will not survive financially. The RMA has been used as a weapon against hard working Kiwi’s. This must be stopped.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Both: I believe that we must deal with the effects of climate change as it materialises & not be preempting theoretical changes far out into the future. Deal with what is here & now.
National Disasters should be funded from the Governments Taxes, where as the likes of flood protection schemes should be funded as they are currently in a split between General Rates, Catchment Rates & Project Watershed ( which Replaced the Tongariro Offset Works Agreement 1967 )which is in place to compensate for the extra 10 – 20% of foreign Whanganui River Water that is diverted into the Waikato Power Dam System in order to run the Waikato Hydro Generators at optimum efficiency.
Do you recognise the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
100% Yes. I have witnessed the absolute destruction caused by Koi Carp & the dramatic effects on the Waikato River.
Remove any barriers to anyone that has an way of using or destroying koi carp.
The volumes are now significant, while in the past, people who have tried to use Koi as a “Resource” have been victimised.
& here we are now with farmers being blamed for the turbidity issues clearly being caused by Koi Carp.
Technologies are evolving all the time, I believe that a solution will be found in time.
Until then, treat them as a resource free for anyone to get involved.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
Yes.
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
No , I think that farmers are well & truely playing their part what with better farming practices being implemented in order to comply with the likes of “Global Gap” & “Bio-Gro”.
We Do Not Need Another Raft Of Regulations such as those proposed by PC1.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
I place a huge value on the flood protection schemes, not only from the farming point of view, but also taking into account the “Multiplier Effect” (“Mathew Dean” x MAF Economics Division) of export returns that feed the NZ Economy. Waikato Regions conservative figure of $2.3 Billion Dollars is expanded by the income from the countries we export to in the order of $16.5 Billion that is generated by the Waikato Farmers.
Julie Taylor
Briefly, why have you decided to stand for the Waikato Regional Council?
If elected, I hope to enhance community engagement in future decisions facing our region. I am concerned that, currently, there is little public understanding of regional council policy implementation. I would like to see improved communication and transparency. I am a professional communicator who can provide an effective voice for my local community.
I am passionate about protecting and restoring our natural environment for future generations. I believe building resilience to climate change will play a large part in that process. I would love to see all government bodies (whether central, regional or district) working together to create solutions.
If elected to council who are you working for?
I will prioritise my council commitments ahead of other work contracts. As company director of Voices4Events Ltd. I can vary my workload as required.
Do you support the referendum on Maori Wards?
No. I believe the current council structure works well for the regional community.
Will you vote to cap rates?
No, however I would like to see rate rises restricted to the annual rate of inflation.
What measures will you use to judge the regional economy “robust” (as required by the Waikato Settlement Act) in 3 years?
Unsure. I will undertake further research on this issue.
Given that the Council has a budget for 2025-2026 of spending $152.584 million, what financial experience do you bring to the governance table?
I am a businesswoman. Together with managing my company finances, I have held management positions in several not-for-profit organisations (eg. sports clubs, theatres, local Plunket committees). Whilst I have not worked for an organisation with a budget of that size, I do understand the need for fiscal responsibility and transparency.
Do you believe a casting vote by the Council Chairperson should be for the status quo or for change?
I believe that depends on the issue. I would expect the Council Chairperson to vote in the best interests of the community.
What do you believe is the most important thing for WRC’s CEO to achieve in your first term?
Developing a region wide strategy to improve climate resilience.
Do you support the Governments directive to hold off implementing Plans such as PC! Until the new Legislation is enacted?
Yes. That may prevent additional expenditure on court proceedings related to PC1.
How many extra staff do you believe the WRC will need to employ to successfully implement PC1?
Unsure. I will undertake further research on this issue.
Do you consider climate change a Regional or National responsibility and what actions would you require be taken by the Regional Council?
Both a regional and national responsibility. Ideally, all government bodies should work together to create solutions. The Regional Council needs to improve resilience to increased risks of flooding and coastal storms due to climate change. Combine infrastructure improvements, such as stop banks, with nature-based solutions such as restoring wetlands and planting vegetation. Support managed retreat of at-risk areas.
Do you recognize the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp? If so what action do you believe should be taken to deal with the problem?
Yes, I recognise the threat to our environment caused by Koi Carp and other invasive species such as mosquito fish. I believe reward schemes such as the Catfish Cull should be extended to species like koi carp. Additional scientific research into solutions needs to ne supported.
Will you support rates rebates for land retired for riparian or biodiversity protection based on the pre-retirement Land Expectation Value?
Yes
Do you believe that pristine water is achievable for all waterways in the Region? If so how would you achieve this?
Yes, in the long term, provided we make this goal a priority. Protect existing wetlands and restore degraded ones. Plant trees and other vegetation along riverbanks and in upstream areas to filter runoff, provide shade to cool water, and prevent soil erosion which contributes to sediment pollution. Prevent contamination to waterways from chemicals and refuse (such as dumped vehicles, and other human waste). Set pollution and discharge limits aligned with science to promote wellbeing of freshwater ecosystems.
What value do you place on retaining or enhancing flood protection within the region?
It’s vital. Flood protection is becoming increasingly important due to the frequency of severe weather events caused by climate change.